spammers4life wrote: old video from the piratesguild ... piratesguild danielspengies admiralsarjbosa thebeeobee tomserson tcserson tom serson thepiratesguild pussy sex boobs xxx porn sexy anal flyhghgy snark lisanova renetto sxephil dandcvideos zipster nalts methodofmac mrmercedesman moarvideo pizzaboy180 gimmeabreakman wwe batman darknight KatyDBates insanemojo myboss nude encyclopediadramatica updownmostly yahweh 4chan EDiothede burk paris hilton miley cyrus sony starwars startrek ...
An anonymous reader writes "Coming out of Columbia Law School is an article about commercial data brokers and their ability to provide information about individuals to the US government despite Fourth Amendment or statutory protections (abstract, full PDF at Download link). Quoting: 'The Supreme Court has held that the Fourth Amendment does not protect information that has been voluntarily disclosed to a third-party or obtained by means of a private search. Congress reacted to these holdings by creating a patchwork of statutes designed to prevent the government's direct and unfettered access to documents stored with third-parties; thus, the government's access is fettered by various statutory requirements, including, in many cases, notice of the disclosure. Despite these protections, however, third-parties are not restricted from passing the same data to other private companies (fourth-parties), and after the events of September 11, 2001, the government, believing that it needed a greater scope of surveillance, turned to the fourth-parties to access the personal information it could not acquire on its own. As a consequence, the fourth-parties, unrestricted by Fourth Amendment or statutory concerns, delivered — and continue to deliver — personal data en masse to the government.'"
SEWilco writes "You might want to check your spam folder, as SpamAssassin has a rule which is tending to mark email sent in 2010 as spam. There is some discussion in a bug report. The SpamAssassin Wiki FH_DATE_PAST_20XX page doesn't have discussion, but it was updated today with a different date rule."
stereoroid writes "As of January 1, it is a crime in Ireland to commit Blasphemy. The law was changed in July 2009 to fill a gap in the Irish Constitution, which states that it is a crime but does not define what it is, an omission highlighted in a Supreme Court decision in 1999. To mark the occasion, Atheist Ireland published a list of 25 blasphemous quotations on the blasphemy.ie website, from such controversial figures as Bjork, Frank Zappa, Richard Dawkins, Randy Newman, and Pope Benedict XVI. (The last-mentioned was quoting a 14th Century Byzantine Emperor, but that's no excuse.)"
Videos that have been watched and reviewed by peers and found to meet the standards of this site are labeled "Magnified."
Anyone can upload or link to a video for this channel. From here, videos are reviewed by site peers, and videos that meet site standards are labeled "Magnified" and become searchable and visible for all site visitors.